Why Justification by Faith Alone is an Essential Doctrine
(April 25, 2010 )
SERMON:
Romans 14:13-23 ("But of righteousness, joy and peace") We
will also celebrate the baptism of Nate Penven upon his
personal profession of faith. (Nate, I'm getting a lot of
water ready!). And the Grace Orchestra will once again accompany
our hymns. By the way, thank you everyone -- there was a
real feast last week at potluck!
SUGGESTED FAMILY DEVOTIONAL TEXT: Psalm 122
ADULT CLASSES, 9:30am: Spring Session continues! Jump
right into one of five great classes (Jonah, Parenting, College, Choir
and Inquirers).
HYMNS: ~ For All the Saints (Trinity 358)
~ And Can it Be (Trinity 455)
SONGS: ~ Arise My Soul Arise
~ His Love Can Never Fail
~ The Heart of Worship
~ There is No Condemnation
DEVOTIONAL: Why Justification by Faith Alone is an Essential
Doctrine
As we continue to plug along in Romans 14, we are coming into some
interesting territory; of what it means to hold to your own convictions
while simultaneously not causing your sisters or brothers to
stumble. I have also worked out in my mind what I believe is the
outline of Romans 14:1 - 15:7 and I am excited to try to explain that
to you all Sunday morning. Maybe you don't get excited about
structure and outlines, but I sure do. And since
understanding the structure of a Scriptural passage reveals its
theology and is therefore good news for us -- I have a feeling you will
get excited too. Structure sounds dry; but it isn't when it
reveals Christ.
And as we have been working our way through Romans 14, we have spent a
good deal of time discussing those things which are clearly secondary
matters or doctrines -- the specifics of baptism, drinking alcohol (in
moderation), view of the church calendar, and so forth.
These are areas where there is room for freedom and disagreement among
believers.
But recently, I have been reminded why we at the same time must be
clear about matters which are Essential, matters which are
indisputable. Things which must not be denied without endangering
one's soul. And one of those doctrines is the doctrine of
justification by faith alone -- that is, "to the man who does not work,
but trusts God who justifies the wicked, hsi faith is credited as
righteousness" (Romans 4:5). That our works add nothing to
our justification before God, and that justifying faith does one thing
-- it rests in Christ and His work on our behalf. (Out of that
justifying faith stem good works as a fruit, but that is a subject for
another time.)
If this is so, that one must believe in Christ Alone by Faith Alone to
be saved, and not trust one's own works, two questions are sometimes
then posed: First, are we then saving that we are saved by
believing a doctrinal formula rather than by Christ
Himself? Second, what about Roman Catholics? Is
it impossible for Roman Catholics to be saved, since Rome officially
teaches that both faith and works justify a man (cf. the Council of
Trent)?
This question came up several years ago in a theological crisis that
emerged in the Reformed world, which I was asked to try to help
resolve. My task was to respond to a particular pastor from
an independent church who wrote a paper which in part said this:
“It is possible for someone to so adamantly affirm ‛justification by
faith alone,’ that he does not notice that he functionally believes in
‛justification by faith in justification by faith alone.’ ”
Here is how I answered that charge then, and still answer it today:
"By all means, we share the concern about the dangers of trusting one’s
salvation to catechetical ability, or perhaps worse, communicating such
a thing to the sheep under our care. Such a trust in doctrine
alone is just another form of works righteousness. And just as a
proud Calvinist is an oxymoron (or should be anyway; at the very least
he is a moron), so anyone who believes that they will be saved by their
ability to articulate the doctrines of grace does not in fact
understand grace. Moreover, we agree that there are likely many,
many saints who are in fact justified by their faith in Christ and yet
who cannot fully articulate what it means to be justified by faith
alone. That is not only the hope of infants, it is my only hope
as well. And as Dabney or Thornwell said somewhere, there may be
many papists who are in fact justified, but it is despite the Romish
doctrine of justification and not because of it. And it is
very likely and gladly so that this is the case across the whole slew
of denominations.
And yet despite this, I wish to assert that justifying faith is, at
some rudimentary gut level in a person, always an affirmation that it
is Christ alone which saves him -- even if he cannot well articulate
it. In other words, I contend that there is some sense, at the
gut level, that we are justified by faith in justification by
faith. Note, I am not asserting that we place our faith in an
abstraction. Rather, I am saying that justifying faith is at its
root, not “a complex set of demanded responses” (line 205), but
surrender. As the Westminster Larger puts it, justifying faith
“not only assenteth to the truth of the promise of the gospel, but
receiveth and resteth upon Christ and his righteousness” (Q. 72).
That’s it. As the Heidelberg applies the Gospel so wonderfully to
the Sabbath, “that every day of my life, I rest from my evil works, let
the Lord work in me through His Spirit, and so begin already in this
life the eternal Sabbath” (Q. 103). And all of my works are to
one extent or another tainted with evil. I must rest from my
efforts to please God, and rest alone on Christ. He alone is my
hope, my rock, and my salvation. In this sense, as I trust Christ
alone for my justification, then I am recognizing that the instrument
of that justification in me is faith plus nothing. This is not
“mere assentism,” but faith that engages the will alongside the
intellect with the affections thrown in to boot. To that initial
surrender, that collapse upon Christ, God will of course add the
blessings of sanctification and glorification, but that comes
later. Perhaps right after, but later. First comes a faith
which is a surrender, a refusal to do anything but trust Christ alone.
To argue further, think of it from the other end. Suppose that
there is a person who believes in Christ, and is also articulate about
what he believes and why. And this person insists that he is
saved by his belief in Christ which includes his own effort to follow
Him. You quiz this man and he insists that his following Christ
is part of what saves him, that his followership is the equivalent of
meritorious works. To make it plain: this man believes in
salvation by faith in Christ plus his own works. He goes on to
reject clearly the doctrine of justification by faith alone.
Shall we give this person the slightest degree of assurance? Of
course not. He is trusting himself alongside Christ, and thus
still (thinks he) has reason to boast. And God resisteth the
proud. So to argue from this extreme backwards, it follows that
if one is truly justified, one must believe at some gut level,
articulate or not, that one is saved by Christ alone through faith
alone." [End of Quote]
This semester, it has been my great privilege to study the Bible with a
Roman Catholic layman who I believe to be one of the most biblically
knowledgeable, humble and gentle Christians I have ever met.
I have every confidence, from my view point, that he is
justified. He appears to embrace justification by faith
alone. But because he is not in our church, but is a guest of
mine, I have felt no need to confront him with the official Roman
Catholic doctrines. If he is meant to leave, God will show him
that in time (Phil. 3:15).
However, at the same time, if I know of a educated person who
explicitly rejects salvation by faith alone in order to embrace the
doctrines of Rome, to his own master he will stand or fall (Romans
4:5), but I have much less confidence that he will in fact stand,
because he is knowingly and willfully rejecting free grace and choosing
to trust his own works as part of his justification. That
is why Justification by Faith Alone is an essential doctrine, and why
we must continue to oppose the doctrines of Rome, even as we love her
members. See you all Sunday! ~ Pastor H